Challenges in lease accounting
Accounting
for leases has been of debate always. IASB has issued a discussion paper which proposes a new accounting model of recognizing
all leases on balance sheets of lessees. Presently only finance leases are recognized on the balance sheets of lessees.
The discussion
paper attempts to address a few concerns in lease accounting including:
- An entity procuring a major asset on operating lease is not required to show the asset
on its balance sheet;
- Lessee, in an operating lease, obtains a source of unrecognized financing which is difficult
for users of financial statements to understand;
- Present accounting model provides opportunities to structure transactions in such a manner
so as to achieve a particular class of lease classification.
Accounting by Lessee
The rights
and obligations of lessee can be summarized as:
Rights |
Obligations |
- Right to use the asset for the lease term
|
- Obligations to pay rentals;
- Obligations to return the asset at end of lease term.
|
IASB defines
“assets and liabilities” as:
Assets |
Liabilities |
Entity controls the economic resource or benefit
It arises
out of a past event
Future economic benefits are expected to flow to entity |
Entity has
a present obligation
Obligation
arises out of a past event
Obligation
is expected to result in outflow of economic benefits
|
The existing
lease accounting model is inconsistent with the definitions of “asset and liability” if, the above definitions
of “asset and liability” are applied to “lessee rights and obligations”. Instead of treating finance
leases as purchase of assets and operating leases as executory contracts, IASB proposes that to treat all lease contracts
as “acquisition of a right to use the leased item” for the lease term.
Proposal of
IASB
It is proposed to initially measure “at
present value of lease payments” (discounted using the lessees’ incremental borrowing rate) the:
- Obligations of Lessees to pay lease rentals; and
- Cost to Lessees of “right to use the asset”.
It is proposed
to measure in subsequent period the
- Obligation to pay rentals at an “amortized cost” where the interest is accrued
on the outstanding obligations to pay rentals;
- Right to use asset at amortized cost by amortizing the asset at shorter of the “lease
term” and “economic life of the asset”.
Accounting
by Lessor
“Right
to use” model could be applied to lessor in two ways:
- Lessor transfers a portion of leased item to the lessee; or
- Lease contract is viewed as creating a new right (leaving lessors’ right to leased
asset unchanged)
Under the first
approach
- Lessors exchange all or a portion of the leased asset in exchange for right to receive
payments over the lease term; and
- Retains right to lease item at the end of lease term.
This would
result in derecognizing the leased item and recognizing
a receivable and residual value of asset. The “right to receive payment” and “right to receive economic
benefits from residual value” would meet the definition of the asset and thus would qualify to be assets
Under the second
approach the lease contract is viewed as creating a new right (an unconditional right to receive payments) with a corresponding
liability (an unconditional obligation to permit to use the leased asset). Thus the lessor creates a new asset and liability
apart from the leased asset continuing to appear on the balance sheet.
One of
the principal objectives of this article is getting familiarized with the terms and language used by IASB. This would greatly
help in IFRS implementation and debating the various issues arising there from.